Jen Scharf: "The reason i know this is because I've never not known it. It's my knowledge i get to say where it came from. You're just going to have to take my word for it, because muh authorituh."
Also Jen Scharf:
"We have to ask ourselves the question, what exactly makes testimony authoritative? There's a problem of alot of liars saying nonsense and people believing them. We have to have some means of judging whether someone's testimony is valid... We don't believe in blind faith. We want people to use discernment... just being told something and being expected to believe it is not really going to be meaningful..."
Also Jen Scharf:
"i don't accept he validity of modern science, and i'm proving that point by not publishing my predictive model. I want to destroy their credibility, and i think I've done a pretty good job so far."
Also Jen Scharf:
"it's an article that came out by scientists, that i wasn't connected to, but it came out after i put my theory out there and it validates my model. I don't care if they came up with the theory on their own or if they stole it from me, i just want the information to be out there. It's evidence in support of my model."
Roof: "So What can i look at that would literally give a good definition of your model?"
Also Jen Scharf :
"I don't actually have my model written out. I don't want it to get out there. But i could explain it to you, it would take a few hours, but it does predict EVERYTHING."
Domingo: How was she plagiarized by a Chinese math team if she never published her predictive model in the first place? can she prove she was plagiarized? Can her model predict who is going to plagiarize her in the first place?
Source: The 13th Hour Podcast
0 Comments