Advertisement

The US is opposed to restoring relations with trilateral convergence Russia,China and Iran WHY..?

The US is opposed to restoring relations with trilateral convergence Russia,China and Iran WHY..? "The trilateral convergence of Russia-China-Iran", dubbed The Diplomat at the end of December, seems to be very surprising in Washington: speaking to the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) on January 2, Rear Admiral Khanzadi, Iranian Commander of the Navy, said that Washington and its allies have held an emergency meeting aimed at disrupting the exercise.

US opposes restoration of relations with Russia, China and Iran amid policy 'maximum pressure'
The recent violent US attacks on Iranian allies in Iraq and Syria, which culminated in the assassination of Iranian Major General Qasem Soleimani, in a broader geopolitical sense, were intended to send signals to the Eurasian triumvirate building to stop their collaborative activities, let alone longer - the strategic terms and design of the Belt and Road Initiative-linked, "said Pye Ian, an American economic analyst and private equity executive.
According to Ian, the US decision to increase pressure on Tehran may stem from Washington's belief that Iran is "the weakest link" in strengthening the Eurasian alliance ".

However, "Russia, China and Iran cannot be blatantly attacked, let alone be attacked, occupied or 'regime altered'," economic analysts highlighted.

Christopher C. Black, a Toronto-based international criminal lawyer with 20 years of experience in war crimes and international relations, echoes American economists.

"This is ... in response to close relations between Russia, Iran and China and it is no coincidence that this murder occurred right when the naval joint training in the Persian Gulf ended," he said. Furthermore, it is a threat to Russia's strategic interests in Syria and Syria itself. "
Apart from this, the move indicates that "one of the reasons for US pressure on Iran is to control oil supplies to China to cripple China's development," Black suggested.

Russia and its military success in the region have become another irritation for Washington, according to Max Parry, an independent American geopolitical journalist and analyst.

"The US may feel the need to reassert itself as a hegemonic power in the region, given that Moscow has emerged as a new intermediary for peace in the Middle East with the Syrian conflict," Parry said. "Russia completely outperformed Washington and at the end of the war, Turkey was practically in the Moscow camp. Trump has reset US foreign policy with a withdrawal from Syria and targeting Iran."

By denying Soleimani, the US "has really overplayed its hands and this could be the beginning of the end for Washington because there will be no cakewalk for war with Iran", he stressed.
'Triumvirate' Eurasia Moving From US Dollars
According to Ian, in addition to being a thorn in the flesh of Washington, Moscow, Beijing, and Tehran have other similarities: the three countries are increasingly pulling away from the US dollar.

The trend follows the Trump administration:
· Unilateral withdrawal from the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Actions (JCPOA) in May 2018;

· A trade war waged against the People's Republic of China by Washington since March 2018;

· A series of anti-Russian sanctions imposed on Moscow on the pretext of last interference in the 2016 US presidential election, something Russia strongly denies.

Economic analysts explain that "the trick of a dollar's universal trust requires uniform compliance, with natural adoption or by force". While US allies remain obedient to the dollar-dominated system, those who oppose it such as Iraq under Saddam, Libya under Gaddafi and Venezuela under Chavez "triggered several Atlantic powers, either overtly or secretly, to try and restore the country the country is back. on the appropriate page. "

However, "the current state of dollar printing by the US Fed ad infinitum cannot last forever," Ian stressed.
Global and South global are already ahead of Transatlantic banking, in a sense, by shifting dollars and securities further into their own currency exchange, or bilateral, gold, and / or domestic or collaborative cryptocurrency ventures, "he said.
Russia, China, Iran, as well as India and several other Eurasian countries turned to trading in local currencies and continue to collect gold at a steady pace. For example, Russia produced more than 185.1 tons of gold in the first six months of 2019; The country's gold bar reserves reached 72.7 million troy ounces (2,261 tons) as of December 1, 2019. For its share, the People's Bank of China (PBoC) had accumulated 1,948.3 tons of precious metals in December 2019, according to the World Gold Council.

Ian estimates that if the countries of the world continue to shift away from US Treasury obligations and choose alternative currencies for pricing energy, trade, and recycling of reserves, it could "cause US interest rates
to fly higher, cratering consumer, institutional and public debt obligations and re-importing an obscene level of inflation back into the US"

source:sputnik




#Russia #China #Iran

russia,china,iran,The trilateral convergence,AS,US,American economists,Washington,the diplomat,The trilateral,

Post a Comment

0 Comments